This order has been set on revision status. Please press the “Confirm” button to tell us you are aware of this, and that you will complete it within the time provided.
If a customer’s revision instructions contradict the initial ones, please write a message to the Support Department saying what exactly was changed and/or what new information was added (with specific examples from the customer’s message or the files attached). If the Support Department considers your arguments valid, the client will be asked to pay additional money, and your bid will be increased.
Revision instructions are as follows:
INSTRUCTIONS NOT FOLLOWED:Mini debate: Programs and services should not be desgined specifically for COIP but rather improved for all children “at risk”
Do you agree or disagree.
Student will complete 1-2 page paper defending your opinion on the issue with 3-5 arguments and respective citation.
graded as follow:
arguments was stated correctly and was clear and relevant
argument included information from class discussion
argument included related and appropiate research/reference citations
SOURCES:Where Do You Stand?
Mini Debate # 5
• Programs and services should not be
designed specifically for COIP but rather
improved for all children “at risk.”
(Wakefield and Wildeman) ( Johnston and Sullivan)
Sources can be obtained from 2 books:
Children oif the Prison Boom: Mass incarceration and the Future of American Inquality. Sara Wakefield and ChristopherWildeman, 2014
Parental Incarceration: Personal Accounts and Developmental Impact, Authors Denise Johnston and Megan Sullivan, 2016
Thank you for cooperation.